Talk:Communications Policy

Communications

I'm wondering about the clause 3. It says that at least an anglophone and a francophone need to develop any communications from Wiki Canada, but the need of the communication to be bilingual is already captured in the 2.6. I'm not sure if we want to keep the need to have every communications developed by at least two members of the Board, but I think the last part of that clause is too much. Amqui 08:19, 20 April 2012 (EDT)

I agree. I think too that "official communication" would be a better term, and it should be clearly defined. There is still confusion in my mind about who does what. Can the secretary be designated as the "public communications officer"? Who is in a position to actually attach a logo to a communication? Eclecticology 13:55, 20 April 2012 (EDT)

To answer who is in a position to attach the logo, any Board members can according to this policy. I agree with you that we should look at defining a public affairs officer position. I only disagree with the need of having a francophone and an anglophone for each communication from the Board, having the need of the communications to be bilingual is enough in my opinion. Amqui 17:27, 20 April 2012 (EDT)

I don't disagree with you, and support the general idea of the proposal. It just needs some points clarified. Benoit wrote this one, and I would like to see him respond before I go in there, and start hacking at it. Eclecticology 22:15, 20 April 2012 (EDT)